Photovoltaics · C&I · Buy + Contracting · CUBE CONCEPTS

Commercial and industrial photovoltaic systems — saving money, expertly planned, and built to last over 20 years.

CUBE CONCEPTS plans, builds, and operates photovoltaic systems for commercial sites — either as a purchase investment with full balance sheet activation or Contracting with an initial investment of €0. The economic leverage arises from the difference between the 5.7–12.0 ct/kWh electricity generation costs for PV rooftop systems (Fraunhofer ISE) and the 17.2 ct/kWh industrial electricity price (BDEW, August 2026) — priced on a site-specific basis, independent of the manufacturer, and across Europe.

5.7–12.0 ct/kWh

Power generation costs for PV roofs over 30 kWp (Fraunhofer ISE, July 2024)*

Photovoltaic contracting

€0

Own investment

no CAPEX — fixed-price contract for the duration

1 Contractual Partner

CUBE CONCEPTS
for the entire project

from 750 kWp

Project entry · Rooftop systems
Buy or Contracting

02 — Hidden Costs

What remains: in-house production, a contractually secured fixed price, or both.

Photovoltaics relieve the burden on the balance sheet at four key points:

Four pressure points are currently increasing the electricity costs of commercial sites. Photovoltaics relieve three of these directly — by producing their own electricity at 5.7–12.0 ct/kWh instead of 17.2 ct/kWh from the grid. With the fourth pressure point, it provides the compliance response.

Every unused roof space is a 20-year electricity bill — unrecoverable.

Pressure Point 01 — The industrial electricity price

“We pay 17+ cents/kWh from the grid — and our margin is getting smaller.”

The average industrial electricity price is currently 2026 17.2 ct/kWh (BDEW Strompreisanalyse, August 2026)*. The industrial electricity price approved by the BMWE on April 16, 2026 (5 ct/kWh as the lower limit, KUEBLL procedure) covers only 91 sectors and a maximum of 50 % of consumption — and is limited to 2026–2028. For all others, the supply from the grid remains available. Self-production at 5.7–12.0 ct/kWh (Fraunhofer ISE 2024) is free from the first day of sunshine onwards.

Pressure point 02 — CO2Pricing

„EU ETS 2 from 2028 — and we still don’t know what it will cost us.“

The EU Environment Council has decided on November 5, 2025, to introduce EU ETS 2 from 2027 onwards. 01.01.2028 postponed. Until then, the BEHG applies in Germany with a fixed price corridor of 55–65 €/tonne CO22 in 2026 and 2027. Photovoltaic self-consumption is bilaterally CO2-free. Each kWh produced by yourself replaces one kWh of CO2Service.

Pressure Point 03 — Grid Fees

“"About 40 % of our electricity bill consists of grid fees—and they keep going up."”

Grid fees account for around 40% of the industrial electricity price (BMWE, August 2025)*. With self-consumption via photovoltaics, the volume-dependent grid fee components no longer apply to the self-produced kWh. The effect depends on the location — with a high self-consumption rate, an additional economic lever is created in addition to the difference in generation costs.

Pressure Point 04 — PV Obligation in 11+ Federal States

“PV is no longer optional — it is a legal requirement for new construction and renovation.”

As of September 18, 2026, 10 of 16 federal states A photovoltaic obligation for new commercial buildings is legally enshrined (Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria, Berlin, Bremen, Hamburg, Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland, Schleswig-Holstein), Hesse partially. As of January 1, 2027, a nationwide solar obligation applies for new non-residential buildings with more than 250 m² of usable area (§ 106 Building Modernization Act). Those who do not adopt the logic of investment must nevertheless build — without the economic leverage.

03 — Competition

A 20- to 30-year-old infrastructure should not be subject to any vendor ecosystem.

No provider ecosystem. What is offered with you is advertised on a location-specific basis.

Photovoltaic systems last 20 to 30 years. CUBE CONCEPTS does not lock customers into proprietary manufacturer ecosystems. Every component — modules, inverters, transformers, monitoring, storage — is tendered on a site-specific basis. Selection follows the site, not the sales partner.

What “manufacturer-independent” means in practice

Inverters, modules, substructure, monitoring — every component is put out to tender for the specific location. Suppliers compete for the system, not the customer relationship. When it comes to service, warranty extension, or component replacement, you remain independent of the vendor who made the original sale. This measurably reduces the total cost of ownership over the 20- to 30-year lifespan of the system.

Open-Book calculation as standard

Every quote includes a complete breakdown of costs—components, installation, logistics, engineering, and margin. No flat-rate packages, no hidden markups. The customer sees what the system costs and makes a decision based on transparent figures. Open-book pricing is also the standard in the Contracting model: the fixed-price calculation is based on documented assumptions.

04 — PV Basics

Which photovoltaics support your balance sheet, your operations, and your procurement logic?

PV power 20 years predictable.

Three things are non-optional if photovoltaics are to succeed at an industrial site: electricity cost savings over two decades, zero operational effort, and a model choice that fits the balance sheet — not the other way around.
blank

01

Cost savings on electricity over 20 years

The electricity storage costs for PV rooftop systems over 30 kWp are between 5.7 and 12.0 ct/kWh (Fraunhofer ISE, July 2024). Industrial electricity price 2026 so far on average: 17.2 ct/kWh (BDEW, August 2026). The difference per kilowatt-hour consumed by the system is the final cost. The size of the difference at your location is shown in the site-specific calculation.

02

Zero operational cost

CUBE handles design, permitting, connection, commissioning, monitoring, cleaning, inverter replacement, insurance, and direct marketing. In the Contracting model, all these services are included in the 20-year fixed-price contract; in the purchase model, they are available as optional contract services. What remains the customer’s responsibility: consuming electricity.

03

Model selection based on balance sheets, not technology

The system itself is identical in both models: same modules, same inverters, same design. What sets them apart is the accounting treatment. A purchase capitalizes the system as an asset (property, plant, and equipment; depreciation over 20 years; IRR on invested capital). Contracting keeps the balance sheet clean (no CAPEX, electricity purchases as OPEX, no capitalization). Which model is viable—that is determined by the balance sheet, not the system technology. More in Section 06.

05 — Economic Efficiency

Industrial electricity prices, electricity cost sustainability, regulatory pressure — the numbers that bear on any economic viability.

Which three backbone numbers carry every economy — and where do they come from?

What is written here is supported by audited studies or official data.

17.2 ct/kWh

Industrial electricity price, average 2026 so far
(BDEW electricity price analysis, August 2026)*

5.7–12.0 ct/kWh

Electricity storage costs for PV roofs over 30 kWp
(Fraunhofer ISE, July 2024)*

55–65 €/t

CO2-Fixed price BEHG 2026/2027
EU ETS 2 from 01.01.2028*

How the three numbers drive profitability

The difference between the reference price (17.2 ct/kWh) and the electricity consumption costs (5.7–12.0 ct/kWh), generates the primary economic leverage per kilowatt-hour consumed itself. The regulatory pressure (CO2 pricing, PV obligation, rising grid fees) further strengthens the lever, because purchase costs keep rising while photovoltaic electricity remains plannable at a stable price for 20 years. The regulatory assumptions are based on market benchmarks from KPMG (Investment Case Stationary Battery Storage, February 2026).

06 — Models

The difference lies not in the plant, but in the balance sheet.

Buying or Contracting — what really determines the decision: the balance sheet analysis or technical analysis?

The photovoltaic system itself is identical in both models — same modules, same inverters, same design. What differs is the balance sheet: capitalization with your own system or electricity supply with a fixed-price contract. Which model works is decided by the location's balance sheet logic.

07 — Complete Takeover

What we do so you don't have to do anything — eight engineering building blocks.

Under the Contracting model, CUBE assumes full responsibility for 20 years; under the purchase model, each individual component is available as an optional contractual service. What is described here is standard in every commercial CUBE system and is documented in the practical examples below.

blank

01

Location & Load Profile Analysis

Evaluation of load profiles, procurement costs, grid connection margins, and suitability of roof and ground surfaces. Output: robust system sizing and self-consumption forecast.

02

Open-book calculation
Cost breakdown for components, installation, engineering, and margin—transparently documented. In Contracting: fixed price based on this breakdown. For purchases: a quote with full traceability.

03

Approval & Grid Connection

Building permit, connection request to the distribution network operator, grid compatibility study, marketing certificates. Complete documentation and authority communication by CUBE.

04

Design & Component Selection

Site-specific tender for modules, inverters, substructures, and monitoring. No predetermined manufacturers. Selection based on site requirements, not sales partnerships.

05

Engineering, Procurement, Construction

Setup and installation by certified partner installers. Construction phase management, safety audits, ongoing construction quality assurance. CUBE remains the contracting partner for all trades.

06

Start-up & Commissioning

Functional and performance testing, grid connection commissioning, system certificate, EEG registration, direct marketing contract. Handover to regular monitoring.

07

Monitoring & Performance Optimization

24/7 system monitoring, performance reporting, early warning system for performance deviations, periodic cleaning, and module replacement in case of failure. Included in the Contracting Standard plan; optional with purchase.

08

Direct Marketing & Revenue Optimization

Marketing of surplus electricity through accredited direct marketers; billing with the site is transparently documented. In the Contracting model, this is part of the fixed-price contract; in the purchase model, it is an optional contract service.

08 — PV Obligation & Regulations

Which federal states have a photovoltaic obligation, and what will apply nationwide from 2027 onwards?

As of September 18, 2026, 10 of the 16 federal states have legally mandated photovoltaic (PV) systems for new commercial buildings and, in some cases, for renovations. Hesse partially has such a requirement. Five federal states currently have no nationwide PV requirement. With the Building Modernization Act, a nationwide solar requirement will apply starting January 1, 2027 for new non-residential buildings with more than 250 m² of usable space, and starting January 1, 2028 for existing non-residential buildings with more than 500 m² of usable space in cases where changes are subject to reporting requirements.

09 — Practical Examples

Two locations, two interpretations, two model paths.

What do two realized CUBE photovoltaic systems look like in numbers?

Both from completed CUBE projects, documented anonymously. Both with open-book calculation; in the multi-use combination (case study B) supplemented by market benchmarks from KPMG (February 2026) for the storage share.

blank

Practical example A · 2024 · Frozen-food logistics center in Lower Saxony

Interpretation: 1.2 MWp rooftop photovoltaic system · Model: Purchase · Self-consumption rate: 78 % · Commissioning: Q3 2024 · Anonymized.

~1.150 MWh/a

Annual yield
location-specific verified

9–11 ct/kWh

Savings on electricity costs
against reference from the net

1.2 MWp

Roof photovoltaics
Model: Purchase

78%

Self-consumption rate
year-round deep-freeze load handling

Effect: The facility is part of the site’s assets and offers special AFAs. High self-consumption rate thanks to year-round deep-freeze loading — the PV profile and consumption profile are structurally aligned.

blank

Practical example B · 2024–2025 · Industrial site Saxony · Multi-use with battery storage

Interpretation: 1,895 MWp photovoltaic (roof + carport) · 1 MW / 2 MWh BESS · Model: PV purchase + BESS Contracting · anonymized.

~1,800 MWh/a

Annual PV yield
BESS Marketing

1,895 MWp

Photovoltaics
Roof + Carport

1 MW / 2 MWh

Battery Energy Storage System (BESS)
in the BESS Contracting

3

regulatory constellations
modelled

Effect: Photovoltaics in the self-consumption model (purchase), battery storage in the profit-share contracting model (CUBE 75% / customer 25% of net market revenues after OPEX). Three regulatory scenarios were modelled for the multi-use revenues on the basis of KPMG market benchmarks (February 2026): conservative (StromNEV), base (AgNes grid) and optimistic (AgNes price).

10 — Substance

Who builds CUBE photovoltaics — over 45 energy experts at three locations, operating across Europe since 2020?

CUBE CONCEPTS is a system developer for integrated energy projects. Photovoltaics, battery storage, multi-use. The engineering stack relies on its own energy experts and established industrial partners such as NOVUM engineering from Dresden for BESS components.

45+

Energy experts
permanently employed

3

Locations: Kaarst,
Prague, Palma de Mallorca

since 2020

Europe-wide Design

Commercial and Industrial

exclusively industrial
and trade

Engineering Stack

01

In-house energy experts

45+ permanently employed engineers, energy economists, project managers. In-house expertise for design, permitting, direct marketing — not sourced through external consulting pools.

02

Industry Partners for Specific Components

Tier-1 industry partnerships for complementary components. Example: NOVUM Engineering from Dresden for BESS components in multi-use projects. Clear separation: system integration and site responsibility remain with CUBE.

03

Refinancing Partner for Contracting Models

Structured financing partnerships for Contracting models. CUBE bears the CapEx risk over the term of the contract, refinanced through external institutional partners.

blank

Realized for Tier 1 industrial companies:

TI AUTOMOTIVE
MAGNA
VALEO
VOESTALPHINE
TENNECO
ITW

FAQ

Quick Starts. Depth and location-specifics will be clarified in the open-book discussion.

What ten questions does every commercial location ask before making a decision?

At what plant size is photovoltaics economical for our location?

CUBE CONCEPTS installs commercial photovoltaic rooftop systems from 500 kWp — the range where design, self-consumption, and marketing optimization are economically viable. The actual profitability depends on load profile (15-minute values), roof area, self-consumption rate, and grid connection constraints.

The system itself is identical — same modules, same inverters, same design. What differs is the balance sheet: in the purchase model, you activate the system as an asset (CAPEX, depreciation over 20 years, IRR on invested capital). In the Contracting-model, the balance sheet remains free (0 € own investment, fixed price electricity billing as OPEX, no activation). Which model is chosen depends on the balance sheet logic of the location — not the system technology.

Contracting CUBE finances, builds, and operates the facility. The site obtains photovoltaic electricity at a fixed price guaranteed by contract for the duration of the contract (typically 20 years). There is no CAPEX outflow, no asset recognition in the balance sheet, no operational costs for operation, maintenance, or insurance. The site provides the roof space.

As of September 18, 2026, 10 of the 16 federal states have legally established a PV requirement for new commercial buildings: Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria, Berlin, Bremen, Hamburg, Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland and Schleswig-Holstein. Hesse partially. Five federal states (Brandenburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, Thuringia) currently do not have a nationwide PV requirement; Brandenburg has lifted its requirement in 2026. Starting January 1, 2027, a nationwide solar requirement will apply for new non-residential buildings with more than 250 m² of usable area (§ 106 Building Modernization Act).

The electricity storage costs for PV rooftop systems over 30 kWp are in Germany at 5.7–12.0 ct/kWh (Fraunhofer ISE, Study on the Cost of Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy, July 2024). The exact position depends on the installation design, component selection, site irradiation, and financing costs. Comparison: The industrial electricity price was on average 17.2 ct/kWh in 2026 (BDEW electricity price analysis, August 2026).

CUBE analyzes load demand (15-minute values), connection costs, grid connection, roof area suitability and self-consumption potential. Output: loadable system sizing, electricity cost savings forecast, model recommendation (buy vs. lease Contracting), and open-book calculation with full cost breakdown. Duration of initial consultation: 30–60 minutes. Free and non-binding.

Excess electricity from systems with more than 100 kW is directly marketed: There is no fixed feed-in tariff for these systems; the market premium under the EEG requires direct marketing. CUBE registers the systems in the market data register and organizes the direct marketing through accredited direct marketers. The marketing is tailored to the specific location — based on an analysis of load profiles, system size, and the current market situation.

Typical project duration for commercial PV systems from 500 kWp: 6–12 months. Breakdown: 2–3 months for site analysis and contract negotiation; 2–4 months for approval and grid connection; 1–3 months for design and component procurement; 1–2 months for EPC construction phase and commissioning. Multi-use combination with battery storage can require additional 2–4 months.

Under the Contracting model, it is common practice to have the option to purchase the system at its residual value upon expiration of the contract term, to extend the fixed-price contract for additional years, or to have CUBE dismantle the system. The specific terms are agreed upon in the contract on a site-by-site basis. For photovoltaic systems, the technical lifespan of the modules is typically 25–30 years, so a contract extension is often the best economic option.

12 — Open-Book Accounting

What does an initial consultation look like — and what comes out of it?

CUBE CONCEPTS analyzes location data, load profiles, and electricity costs—and shows you in 30 minutes which photovoltaic system design is economically viable. Purchase, Contracting, or Multi-Use with battery storage. Open-book. Based on your actual data. No upfront investment required, if you prefer.

Solar carports - aerial view

Newsletter registration